Election 2026: A Guide to Political Party Promises for Early Childhood Education

Search Newsroom Posts
Election promises, political parties and politics of early childhood education in NZ

Election 2026: A Guide to Political Party Promises for Early Childhood Education

Election 2026 is fast approaching. Political parties are starting to release their early childhood education policies and campaign commitments. Many voters will cast their ballots well before election day, so having clear, up‑to‑date information matters.

OECE will track each party’s announcements as they are released.

This page will be updated regularly as new policies and promises roll out, allowing you to compare positions at a glance and see what each party says it will do for early childhood education. Our aim in providing this guide for Election 2026 is to support you to assess whether proposed policies are moving in the right direction, missing what really matters, behind the times, or potentially harmful for children, teachers, or services.

We’ve been reporting on election promises every three years, beginning with the 2005 General Election. Looking back across those campaigns, one pattern is unmistakable: many promises simply aren’t delivered.

Why is this? Good policies are often set aside in the interests of political expediency. In coalition governments especially, a party may drop or dilute a policy to maintain cohesion or satisfy its partners. Recent experience with the National–ACT–NZ First Coalition Government has also shown that voters who support one party’s early childhood education policies (National or NZ First) may find that, once in government, coalition dynamics can completely shift which party’s values and priorities (ACT’s) shape the agenda.

National party

National’s specific ECE commitments for election 2026 are:

  • Stop all screen and individual-device use in ECE
  • Introduce a School Start Check at ECE before children transition to primary school
  • Introduce developmental milestones throughout ECE and have services report children’s progress to parents along with identifing areas where children may need additional support and address that through the Early Intervention Service
Nicola Willis accepts the petition for ECE teacher pay parity.  Election 2020 support.  Will the National Party support teachers in Election 2026

The last substantial ECE policy National released was in 2020, when Nicola Willis was the party’s spokesperson for ECE. At that time, National proposed a wide range of changes across ECE provision, operations, and funding. Key elements included tightening monitoring and enforcement of regulated standards and continuing to lift pay requirements for ECE teachers.

Some of the ideas National promoted in 2020 have since been implemented during its time in government, for example, reducing regulatory red tape (an area where it aligned closely with ACT) and making teacher registration free for ECE teachers.

However, most of its other proposals including stronger enforcement of standards and further progress on teacher pay have not been advanced under the coalition arrangements of the past three years, and in several of these areas policy has, in practice, moved in the opposite direction to what it

Opportunity party

The Opportunity Party is not currently represented in the New Zealand Parliament, but recent polling shows a steady upward trend for the party as the November 2026 election approaches.

Opportunity refers to early childhood education as “early learning”, uses the term ECCE for the ECE system, and describes home‑based ECE as home‑based care.

Key Policy Commitments

  • Replace the current licensing approval model to quality-based contracting (based on government objectives of the day)
  • Prioritise flexibility for ECCE centres to co-locate with retirement villages
  • In homebased care, move away from 1 educator to up to 4 children per home setting to 2 educators and up to 8 children per home
  • Increase core funding for Playcentre, Kōhanga Reo, Kindergartens, Pacific language nests, Playgroups
    and Nature Based Services.
  • Require minimum ratios of 1:3 for under-twos, 1:5 for 24-36 months and 1:8 for children aged three and over.
  • Match Australian standards for the amount of space per child indoors and outdoors (not specified whether this applies to both home‑based and centre‑based settings).
  • Set maximum indoor group sizes
  • Requiring 80% minimum qualifications for teacher-led services (qualification level or which qualifications are not specified).
  • Expand the NZCER Wellbeing@School survey to ECCE teachers.

Read more: Opportunity Party – Future Fit Education Policy

It’s policy direction now differs quite a bit from its 2023 election commitments, which focused on:

  • Pay parity for ECE teachers with primary and secondary teachers.
  • Integrating early childhood education with the early years of primary school, aiming for a more coherent and continuous learning pathway for children.
  • Levelling the playing field between community‑run and corporate ECE centres, recognising the educational value of community settings and the benefits of involving parents in teaching and learning.
  • Limiting the size of ECE centres and introducing more stringent requirements for physical space and educator‑to‑child ratios.
  • Increasing support for parent‑led and community‑owned ECE services.

NZ First party

One of the party’s founding principles is that “money spent on education will be treated as an investment, not as expenditure.” Past statements have acknowledged that ECE is not simply childcare or babysitting, but must be high‑quality and educational for the hours children attend. However, in recent times NZ First has shown limited engagement with the sector’s current conditions, needs, and challenges. At this stage, the extent of NZ First’s commitment to ECE for the 2026 election is unclear.

NZ First’s policy announcements made so far:

  • Kiwi Kids Grant.  In practice, it would give lower‑income families and households reliant on two incomes an improved financial choice for one parent to stay at home during the early years if they choose, and to use low‑ or no‑cost ECE options such as kindergarten or Playcentre.  For some parents the extra $5,000 per year could make the difference between needing to work to live or staying at home with their child/ren.
    • A universal, non‑means‑tested, tax‑free grant of $5,000 per year for the first three years of each of the first, second, and third child = total $15,00 per child or $45,000 for 3 children.  
    • The policy is framed as an incentive to increase the birth rate among New Zealand citizens – noting factors such as career prioritisation, preference for a child‑free adulthood, rising costs, and the sacrifices associated with raising children

Labour party

Labour has not yet released its early childhood education commitments for the 2026 election.

Historically, Labour’s core commitments in ECE have centred on building a well‑qualified, well‑paid workforce including goals to increase the proportion of qualified teachers in ratios, deliver pay parity with school teachers, and ensure services are well resourced to provide a strong curriculum.

Looking ahead to the 2026 election, several broader system‑level questions remain open. These are areas to watch not only for Labour, but for all parties as they develop their ECE platforms:

  • Whether it will initiate a review of regulations through a child‑rights and evidence‑based lens and ensure rules are regularly updated in response to learnings from serious incidents and emerging evidence.
  • Whether it will address concerns about the quality and orientation of policy advice, including criticism that membership of the Ministry of Education’s Early Childhood Advisory Committee is unbalanced, and that advice from the Ministry and ERO to Ministers can prioritise service‑provider interests over those of children, families, and taxpayers.
  • Whether it will restore ECE regulatory functions to the Ministry of Education, reversing the current government’s changes and aiming to integrate ECE more fully into the wider education system
  • Whether it will strengthen support for parents’ participation in their child’s early education
  • Whether it will introduce regular spot‑checks of services to give families greater assurance of safety and quality
  • Whether Labour will restore network management (a policy it introduced when it was last in government) so new services must demonstrate community need before opening

These questions and Labour’s overall direction for ECE will become clearer once the party releases its 2026 policy.

Green party

The Green Party has been the first to release its early childhood education policy for the 2026 election, providing a full set of commitments and a clear outline of its priorities.

Key Policy Commitments

  • End public funding for private, for‑profit ECE centres by 2028. Centres could continue to operate and be licensed, but would need to transition to non‑profit status to receive public funding
  • Expand community and not‑for‑profit ECE provision to strengthen and grow publicly‑focused, community‑based services
  • Cap parent fees at $10 per day per child above the 20‑hour free entitlement, reducing this to zero cost for up to 35 hours from 2029
  • Introduce free early childhood education from 2029, with a network of community ECE centres funded to provide 35 hours a week from 6 months to school age.
  • Directly fund ECE teachers to ensure fair wages and access to training and professional support
  • Pay parity for kaiako (Note that there is little detail on this and whether it would include all ECE qualified teachers from across different service types).
  • Secure long‑term funding for kaupapa Māori providers to strengthen Māori‑led early childhood education
  • Restore the network management function so the Ministry of Education plans ECE provision in the same way school provision is planned, ensuring services are located where communities need them.

Read more: Green Budget: Early Childhood Education for Everyone

Te Pāti Māori party

Te Pāti Māori has not yet released a dedicated early childhood education policy for the 2026 election. However, the party has publicly expressed strong opposition to the current government’s review of early childhood education. As education spokesperson Tākuta Ferris stated:

“If they were really interested in hearing from the public the Government would not be rushing an important process about an entire generation of our tamariki mokopuna with only six weeks of consultation. This Government does not intend to meaningfully consult anyone, so we must contest their agenda.”

While specific ECE policies have not been announced, Te Pāti Māori’s general education platform outlines several principles that signal its likely direction:

  • Build a Māori‑led education authority and solutions: shifting decision‑making power to Māori communities.
  • Embed mātauranga Māori across learning: ensuring Māori knowledge and worldviews are central, not peripheral.
  • Remove barriers that block whānau from education and training: addressing structural and financial obstacles.
  • Support Māori governance and decision‑making in education: strengthening tino rangatiratanga in schooling and early learning.

The party frames its education vision around identity, belonging, and Māori leadership, stating that education should strengthen tamariki, grow confidence, open pathways, and prepare Māori to lead in the world as Māori.

How these principles will translate into specific early childhood education commitments for 2026 remains to be seen.

The ACT party

ACT has not yet indicated its early childhood education policy for the 2026 election. However, many voters will be familiar with ACT’s general positions, given that party leader David Seymour has served as Associate Minister of Education with responsibility for ECE over the past three years.

During this term, ACT’s approach has emphasised reducing regulatory requirements, cutting compliance costs, and making it easier for ECE services to operate. The party has not supported ECE teacher pay parity with school‑based colleagues. There has also been a focus on shifting ECE further from the schooling system, including transferring ECE regulatory functions from the Ministry of Education to ERO, and framing ECE regulation and funding primarily around supporting parents’ participation in the workforce. Taken further, this direction may de‑prioritise part‑day and community‑based services such as Playcentre, free kindergartens, and similar models.

Leave a Reply

Already subscribed?
ECE Newsroom

NZ’s own specialist ECE newsroom. 
Access national and local stories, in-depth analysis, & original commentaries.  

Membership Support for Teachers & Educators

(Comes with free Newsroom and Research access)

Membership Support for ECE Service Owners, Managers, & Community Organisations

(Comes with free Newsroom and Research access)

Researchers & Tertiary Education Libraries

Full access to over 25 years of ECE academic research articles – NZIRECE Journal.
Plus, guidance and resources on doing and publishing research

Has this been useful?  Give us your feedback.

You are welcome to add a link to this page on your website. Copyright belongs to the OECE so please do not copy any content without our written permission.

Information provided is of a general nature. It is provided ‘as is’, and we accept no liability for its accuracy or completeness. See our Terms and Conditions.

Related Posts

teacher wages, pay scales, in childcare and early childhood education

What ECE Teachers and Workers Earn: Pay, Benefits and Conditions

Anyone thinking about getting a job in ECE working in ECE or thinking about moving to a different service will find clear, practical information in this article about pay rates, employment conditions, and what to expect in different roles. It explains everything from starting salaries and pay‑step calculations to workplace rights, benefits, and how to recognise a supportive, professional environment.

Read More »
early childhood research journal online

Changing Roles and Responsibilities: The Development of Coaching in Early Intervention

This paper examines if coaching has a potential role in helping authentic collaborative partnerships between early intervention teachers and early childhood educators and families.
Coaching is a process that can empower. It can also help ECE teachers to examine their own perceptions about the knowledge they hold.

FULL REFERENCE: Mataiti, H., van Bysterveldt, A. & Miller, J. (2016). Changing roles and responsibilities: The development of coaching in early intervention education settings, in Aotearoa New Zealand. NZ Research in ECE Journal, Special Issue: Equality and Diversity, 19, 15 – 31.

Log-in to read the full research paper below. Or order a pdf copy of the article from the main NZIRECE Journal page.

ABSTRACT: Facilitative coaching aims to empower coach-ees by eliciting their inbuilt capacities as individuals and building upon these to achieve self-chosen goals. The practice is increasingly preferred in early intervention (EI) education settings, due to its strong alignment with family-centred approaches. The practice of coaching involves a shift in the roles and responsibilities of those working with children with EI needs. Specifically, coaching is a way of moving away from an expert, directive approach, toward one that facilitates and empowers adults working with the child day to day in natural environments. This has significant potential to break down historical imbalances of power between specialist practitioners, and families and educators, thus supporting key policy directions in Aotearoa New Zealand NZ. This paper utilises the elements of rules, community and division of labour (roles and responsibilities) from the conceptual framework of Activity Theory to provide an overview of the development of and potential for coaching in EI in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), focusing on the practice of the specialist teaching practitioner, the Early Intervention teacher (EIT).

KEY WORDS: Coaching; early intervention; activity theory; roles and responsibilities.

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decade, in an effort to provide services that are family-centred, culturally responsive and ecologically sound, early interventionists in early childhood education (ECE) have moved away from instructional models of teaching and providing direct therapy for children (Alliston, 2007; Ministry of Education – Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga (MoE), 2011a). Changes in governmental policy in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) have also resulted in a significant shift toward ways of working with families/whānau (families) that are facilitative, capacity-building and solution-focused. These are regarded as most helpful for aspirations of empowerment and self-determination of families to be realised (NZ Taskforce on Whānau Centred Initiatives, 2010). One practice that appears to align with these directions is coaching, a relational process applied in a range of settings over the last thirty years, which takes place between two people in order to achieve pre-determined outcomes (Green & Spence, 2014).

This is a member/subscriber only post. To access it, please see the message below for details on access and joining.

Read More »
Two children playing with Duplo blocks at early childhood centre.

Asperger’s Syndrome

Children with Asperger’s in ECE.

Here is an overview of what every parent, educator and child carer needs to know about Asperger’s Syndrome.  It answers common questions such as:

What is Asperger’s Syndrome?How do I know if a child has Asperger’s?What are the earliest signs in infancy, toddlerhood and the preschool years?  W

This is a member/subscriber only post. To access it, please see the message below for details on access and joining.

Read More »
toy train back on track

All Together Now – Providing Family Learning Sessions

Family learning sessions highlight how much parents shape their children’s development and how early childhood teachers can strengthen that impact by meaningfully engaging families. This article is essential reading for New Zealand ECE teachers because it shows why adopting these approaches can deepen partnerships with parents and enrich learning beyond the ECE setting.

This is a member/subscriber only post. To access it, please see the message below for details on access and joining.

Read More »
The Office of ECE

Share This Information

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

The Office of ECE Login

Take Action!

Help spread this vital ECE information, join our free social and email groups and become a member of OECE.

pay parity funding policy

1. Share This Information

2. Follow Our Social Pages

3. Get Regular Updates

Sign up to our free newsletters.

4. Become a Member