
ECE Safety and Standards Enforcement Drops Sharply
New data shows a dramatic decline in regulatory action against

New data shows a dramatic decline in regulatory action against

The ECE sector has delivered an unexpected bright spot in

A young child was left alone in a locked early

Who is Who and Does What in Relation to the
Home » ECE Newsroom » Submissions and Policy Reviews
Unpacking government policies and proposed changes that affect early childhood education, the workforce, families, and children. Our reports and submissions take a closer look at what the policies mean — and what they could change.

This submission responds to the Committee’s invitation to provide views on whether regulatory functions for early childhood education (ECE) should remain within the Ministry of Education or be transferred to a Director of Regulation located in the Education Review Office (ERO). It sets out the Office of Early Childhood Education’s (OECE) assessment of the proposal, the evidence base underpinning it, and the likely implications for the ECE system.

Our Key Concerns at a Glance:
1. Weakened Enforcement: The proposed changes shift focus away from child protection by making licence downgrades dependent on preliminary, softer measures. This delays strong action in response to multiple or serious breaches.

Policy Response: Reducing Teacher Qualification Requirements in ECE Policy Briefing Paper for the Ministry of EducationPrepared by the Office of Early Childhood Education24 Sept 2025

Submission to the Education and Workforce Committee
The Education and Training (ECE Reform) Amendment Bill
Submitted by: Office of Early Childhood Education (OECE)
Date: 29 August 2025
CONTENTS:
– Introduction
– Summary of Key Concerns
– Our Position and Recommendations
– Errors and the Bill’s Shortcomings
– Closing Statement
INTRODUCTION
The Education and Training (Early Childhood Education Reform) Amendment Bill is promoted as a solution to improve the effectiveness of the early childhood education (ECE) regulatory system.
During the Bill’s first reading, Hon David Seymour shared the frustrations of ECE service operators he had spoken with—concerns that prompted the Ministry for Regulation review of the ECE regulatory system. He cited issues such as conflicting rules, a dictatorial approach, minor regulations enforced under threat of closure, and inconsistent enforcement.
The Bill is positioned as a long-overdue fix for these concerns, though it remains unclear whether the scale or severity of these issues truly warrants a full legislative overhaul.
However, the proposed reforms risk triggering serious unintended consequences—what’s known as the cobra effect, where attempts to solve a problem end up making it worse.
SUMMARY OF KEY CONCERNS
1. Sector Impact
The Bill is designed to reduce regulatory burdens for service providers—particularly those who struggle to understand existing requirements or view current regulations and penalties for non-compliance as unfair to themselves and their business operations.
However, these reforms could backfire on the very providers the Bill aims to support.
Looser regulation is likely to attract new entrants driven by commercial interests, potentially forcing high-quality providers to close due to unfair competition.

I am writing to you to express concern about claims made to you by others in the ECE sector purporting that the introduction of the pay parity scheme has led to an increase in ECE centre closures – and to request that you take action to prevent the further spread of this false narrative.
A recent Ministry briefing to your office (METIS No: 1341617. Report: Options to reduce ECE service staffing costs) referenced these claims, made by the Early Childhood Council.

Getting Smarter on Early Childhood Education in NZ’s National Infrastructure Plan
Statement from the Office of ECE. Submitted to the Hon Chris Bishop and the NZ Infrastructure Commission, Te Waihanga. July 16, 2025.
Released August 6, 2025.
The draft National Infrastructure Plan notes that NZ has a formidable number of infrastructure

Office of Early Childhood Education submission on changes to ECE licensing criteria: Our advice and feedback to the Ministry of Education July 24, 2025.OECE –

The FamilyBoost initiative signalled a long-awaited potential shift in government policy on focusing ECE funding on benefitting families, instead of payment to service providers.
However, it has not met expectations, with fewer families applying and fewer families getting the maximum $75-a-week ECE rebate than was forecast.
Data from the Consumer Price Index shows that FamilyBoost has not immediately reduced the financial burden on families who use ECE services.
In February 2025 the OECE wrote:
“Plainly, some ECEs are taking the opportunity to increase their underlying charges because people’s ability to pay higher charges has improved due to the rebate.

This submission to the Ministry for Regulation takes an economic perspective on the ECE regulatory system and regulations – that what is good for children

ECE Teacher Supply and Workforce Strategy – Briefing Paper to Minister Stanford and Associate Education Minister David Seymour BRIEFING PAPERJune 6, 2024. Table of Contents
Help spread this vital ECE information, join our free social and email groups and become a member of OECE.
Sign up to our free newsletters.