Close this search box.

Peer Review Policy Statement for the NZIRECE Journal

Search in Research
NZ International Research in Early Childhood Education journal

Peer Review Policy Statement of Purpose

Peer review is used to assess the quality and accuracy of manuscripts prior to publication.  It is also used to improve manuscripts.

The Peer Review Process

Manuscripts are blind peer-reviewed by two (and sometimes three) reviewers.  

When submitting a manuscript, authors are asked to put author(s) names, affiliations, acknowledgements, and any identifying information on a separate cover sheet (or in a separate file), which the editors will remove prior to the script going to reviewers.  Editors will also check that any identifying detail has been removed before accepting the manuscript into the peer-review process. 

Authors are provided with a copy (or summary) of the reviewers’ feedback. This is regarded as a formative process to assist authors to improve the quality of their manuscript.

Should a manuscript be declined, the author needs to show how they have responded to the feedback when re-submitting. Re-submitted manuscripts will be blind peer-reviewed by one of the original reviewers and a second reviewer who has not seen the manuscript before.  

Should a manuscript be accepted pending minor changes or improvements, changes will be checked by editors prior to final acceptance for publication.

Where the opinions of the reviewers differ on the quality of a manuscript, the editors will carefully assess the evaluations and make a decision. In this case the editor may decide to seek evaluation of the manuscript from a third reviewer. Authors will be advised when a further review is needed.


All reviewers are suitably qualified experts. 

No reviewer will be asked to review a manuscript of an author/s who he/she works with or belongs to the same institution or organisation.    

Ethical obligations

Reviewers are asked not to share, copy, or any way breach the strict confidentiality of the manuscript under review.

Reviewers have the right to decline doing an evaluation of a manuscript, even after reading it.  Reasons may include that they feel they do not have sufficient expertise in the subject matter or method, and that they feel they may not be able to do an objective review. 

If a reviewer has any interest that may impair their objectivity, the reviewer is asked to notify and discuss this with an editor.  If the conflict of interest is able to be managed, declaration of this may be sufficient.  

This statement on Peer Review Policies should be read in conjunction with

Article copyright belongs to the OECE / ChildForum. You are welcome to add a link to this research article on your website.

Are You a Member?

If you have an active membership for this type of post, please login to view it.

Related Posts

the ece safety checklist

The ECE Safety Checklist – Daily Hazard and Safety Checklist

The ECE Safety Checklist – A Daily Hazard and Safety Checklist for Every ECE Service. Checklist items include regulation requirements and reflect learnings from tragic incidents that have happened in ECE. How to Use the Checklist This checklist is to […]

Read More »

Multi-Cultural Activities

Multi-Cultural Activities. Most early childhood education services include bi-cultural elements in their teaching and learning, but with New Zealand becoming an increasingly multicultural country it can be interesting for children to learn about other cultures as well, particularly if there […]

To access this member only information, you must purchase Teacher Membership.

Read More »
Children leaving their early childhood centre.

Head Lice and Nits

Children get head lice. It’s one of those things that is a case of when and not if.  It pays to know how to tell if a child has head lice and how to spot eggs how to carry out effective […]

To access this member only information, you must purchase Teacher Membership.

Read More »
check boxes tick survey promises views planning

Emergency Management Policy, Procedures, and Supplies

Here is a sample emergency management policy template, covering different emergencies such as fire, flooding, terrorist or armed offender, and natural disasters such as earthquakes, volcanic activity, and tsunamis.  We also show you what you might put in a sample […]

Read More »
The Office of ECE

Share This Information

Notice for Students and Library Users
You are able to access all Journal Research articles under the library's subscription. But unless you hold a personal membership you are missing out on a whole lot of valuable teaching and policy articles and other important information. At home, or on your mobile device that is not linked to your institution or library's internet or subscription - click on the JOIN button below.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

The Office of ECE Login

Take Action!

Help spread this vital ECE information, join our free social and email groups and become a member of OECE.

pay parity funding policy

1. Share This Information

2. Follow Our Social Pages

3. Get Regular Updates

Sign up to our free newsletters.

4. Become a Member