{"id":7319,"date":"2013-04-10T09:11:48","date_gmt":"2013-04-09T21:11:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/oece.nz\/general\/news-for-early-childhood-education\/government-decides-ece-participation-is-a-social-obligation-how-peoople-and-services-may-adjust-and-respond\/"},"modified":"2021-07-26T15:15:05","modified_gmt":"2021-07-26T03:15:05","slug":"government-decides-ece-participation-is-a-social-obligation-how-peoople-and-services-may-adjust-and-respond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oece.nz\/public\/news-and-views\/stories\/government-decides-ece-participation-is-a-social-obligation-how-peoople-and-services-may-adjust-and-respond\/","title":{"rendered":"ECE Participation Made a Social Obligation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

April 10, 2013. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Social Security (Benefit Categories and Work Focus) Amendment Bill was passed into law by 61 to 59 with National, ACT and United Future in favour\u00a0on April 9th<\/sup>, 2013.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Parents who temporarily rely on the State for financial help to provide for their child will now face a 50% cut in their benefit payment if they do not use (and pay for out of their benefit) the type and amount of early childcare and education they are directed to sign up to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Parents who value looking after their own child or want to wait for a place to become available at a suitable early childhood service when their child is ready and happy to attend will now risk not having enough money to feed and provide basic necessities for their child. Teachers and early childhood providers potentially will be faced with children and parents who attend not because they want to but because they have to, and maintaining support and partnership with these families will become more difficult.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It would seem that political objectives have won over common sense. Now families, teachers, and ECE providers need to examine the implications and formulate strategies to adjust to the new situation. New issues are likely to emerge that will need to be addressed by the Government and the Ministries of Social Development and Education.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Government\u2019s rationale<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A work objective of wanting all beneficiaries to move back into paid work more quickly underpinned the Social Security Bill changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The main reason stated for selecting ECE use to become a social obligation was that it would \u201cbreak intergenerational cycles of disadvantage\u201d by giving a strong work message to parents combined with ensuring that their children from 3 years were educated outside of the family. Internationally it is hard to find another country that has undertaken such a move – the closest parallel to this perhaps is the policy Australia had to westernise Aboriginal children to improve their standard of living by taking them from their families.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Changing the voluntary nature of children\u2019s participation in ECE serves the purpose of supporting the government\u2019s Better Public Services target of 98% of children in ECE by 2016. At present a crude measure of parents ticking a box on the child\u2019s primary school enrolment form to say whether or not their child has attended an ECE service is used. It is expected that when the Ministry of Education\u2019s new electronic system (called ELI) for recording and tracking children\u2019s individual attendance in ECE goes live that the actual participation rate will be found to be much lower. By shoring up the regular attendance of one group of children in ECE for a minimum of two years (between ages 3 and 5) the Government and Ministry of Education officials will be able to turn their attention to finding ways to get the children of non-beneficiary families to participate more in ECE.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Evidence showing a need to make parents use a childcare\/ECE service<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

There is no strong evidence that this will lift children\u2019s educational achievement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Government does not have exact data on the number of children of people on benefits already participating in some form of ECE and so it is not known if there will be greater numbers of child enrolments in ECE as a result of the new social obligation.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Implications and adjustments<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The implications and options for how to adjust to ECE being turned into a \u2018social obligation\u2019 for one group of families in NZ society need to be explored and discussed. Below are some options and ways parents and others may choose or not choose to respond and adjust.  Please discuss below and add further suggestions for choices that might be opened or forced on any group of people or organisations as a result of the new legal requirement.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Parents who want to choose if and when to use ECE<\/strong> and therefore have their benefit payment halved<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n