Commercial Approach to ECE Fuels Inequalities

Search Entire Website
colourful preschool blocks

Inequalities.
April 27, 2011.

Children from low socio-economic households are accessing early childhood education less than other NZ children, despite government heavily subsidising early childhood education services.

This is the central claim of a new report published by The Salvation Army Social Policy and Parliamentary Unit titled ‘Monopoly Games in the Nursery:  Community, Inequalities and Early Childhood Education’.

“The market approach has been very successful in the more well-to-do communities where parents have taken advantage of Government subsidies”. An example is given of the 20 Hours ECE funding policy which has been shown to have benefited the higher socio-economic groups and largely failed to reach children who would benefit most.

Policy is needed that will help to eliminate poverty. As well there needs to be “some intentional work at the grass roots level of low decile school communities enabling positive pathways for all to access quality ECE”  says report author, Carol Walden.

An answer lies in alternative approaches for delivering ECE and specifically in community development models of ECE. 

For example, one model of ECE provision profiled in the report represents an approach to contributing to family well-being through social services work which includes a playgroup for parents to create a social network, a food-bank, and counselling.  

Another model stems from a faith-based perspective of helping people through a community church.

Community-based ECE helps to develop local networks of support for families.  Such ECE helps to lessen stresses for families, for the benefit of children, says  Carol Waldon.

The report recommends that the Government:

  • Needs to change from an emphasis on education as a commercial commodity to emphasising citizen’s rights for equitable distribution.
  • Initiate ECE expenditure especially directed at the bottom socio-economic groups as a priority over higher socio-economic groups, who have the economic means to access ECE independently of government subsidies.

Has this been useful?  Give us your feedback.

You are welcome to add a link to this page on your website. Copyright belongs to the OECE so please do not copy any content without our written permission.

Information provided is of a general nature. It is provided ‘as is’, and we accept no liability for its accuracy or completeness. See our Terms and Conditions.

Related Posts

many colours of paint concept for early childhood sector groups and early childhood education system

Who is Who in our Sector

Early Childhood Education System. The Stakeholders and Key Organisations Peak Bodies / Largest ECE Service Operators Operators of more than 400 licensed services in our

Read More »
early childhood research journal online

Embedding Literacy in an Early Childhood Education Programme: A Look into Montessori

Children begin school with a range of pre-literacy skills that serve as the foundation for later reading achievement. These skills include phonological awareness, alphabet knowledge and vocabulary. The New Zealand early childhood curriculum Te Whāriki is non-prescriptive in terms of […]

Read More »
Funding tick for early childhood centres and services in NZ

Pay Parity Details, Calculation Sheet for Deciding the Affordability of Opting-In, and Confidential Q&A

Here you can get funding and pay details, ask questions, and learn more than the Ministry will tell you. Use the spreadsheet (see below) to easily estimate the potential financial impact of opting into funding for the 6-Steps funding and […]

Read More »
The Office of ECE

Share This Information

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

The Office of ECE Login

Public Area Categories
Categories