Commercial Approach to ECE Fuels Inequalities

Search Entire Website
colourful preschool blocks

Inequalities.
April 27, 2011.

Children from low socio-economic households are accessing early childhood education less than other NZ children, despite government heavily subsidising early childhood education services.

This is the central claim of a new report published by The Salvation Army Social Policy and Parliamentary Unit titled ‘Monopoly Games in the Nursery:  Community, Inequalities and Early Childhood Education’.

“The market approach has been very successful in the more well-to-do communities where parents have taken advantage of Government subsidies”. An example is given of the 20 Hours ECE funding policy which has been shown to have benefited the higher socio-economic groups and largely failed to reach children who would benefit most.

Policy is needed that will help to eliminate poverty. As well there needs to be “some intentional work at the grass roots level of low decile school communities enabling positive pathways for all to access quality ECE”  says report author, Carol Walden.

An answer lies in alternative approaches for delivering ECE and specifically in community development models of ECE. 

For example, one model of ECE provision profiled in the report represents an approach to contributing to family well-being through social services work which includes a playgroup for parents to create a social network, a food-bank, and counselling.  

Another model stems from a faith-based perspective of helping people through a community church.

Community-based ECE helps to develop local networks of support for families.  Such ECE helps to lessen stresses for families, for the benefit of children, says  Carol Waldon.

The report recommends that the Government:

  • Needs to change from an emphasis on education as a commercial commodity to emphasising citizen’s rights for equitable distribution.
  • Initiate ECE expenditure especially directed at the bottom socio-economic groups as a priority over higher socio-economic groups, who have the economic means to access ECE independently of government subsidies.

Has this been useful?  Give us your feedback.

You are welcome to add a link to this page on your website. Copyright belongs to the OECE so please do not copy any content without our written permission.

Information provided is of a general nature. It is provided ‘as is’, and we accept no liability for its accuracy or completeness. See our Terms and Conditions.

Related Posts

many colours of paint concept for early childhood sector groups and early childhood education system

Who is Who in our Sector

Early Childhood Education System. The Stakeholders and Key Organisations Peak Bodies / Largest ECE Service Operators Operators of more than 400 licensed services in our

Read More »
Teacher and three boys are playing with Duplo block toys on mat at early childhood centre.

Providing for Boys’ Interests

Providing for Boys in ECE. Enter any early childhood setting and there is a good chance you will see some gendered play and behaviour. Our profession is female dominated and early childhood settings can be feminised environments. But equitable play […]

To access this member only information, you must purchase Educator Membership.

Read More »
diwali and young children's celebrations

Diwali or Deepavali – 2023

Diwali Early Childhood Education Children’s Activities. By Karen Miller. Celebrating Diwali or Deepavali, the Indian Festival of Lights is a fun way to bring Indian music and culture into your early childhood service and strengthen links with the Indian diaspora […]

To access this member only information, you must purchase Educator Membership.

Read More »
The Office of ECE

Share This Information

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

The Office of ECE Login

Public Area Categories
Categories